Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Darad Innovation Corporation is engaged in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area with a portfolio that currently includes 1 pending office action. This single active matter indicates a focused effort in the company's patent prosecution. The application is being reviewed within 1 distinct art unit, which points to a specific technical classification for the pending technology.
The examination of the portfolio is handled by 1 distinct examiner, creating a centralized point of contact at the patent office. WATKINS, NATHANIEL WILLIAM is the busiest examiner for this company, with 1 pending office action under his review. Because he is the only examiner involved in the current workload, his specific examination practices and interpretations will be the most influential factors in the outcome of the prosecution.
The data showing 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner suggests a streamlined prosecution environment. Practitioners can focus their resources on a single set of examiner communications rather than managing multiple disparate actions. Success in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area for this portfolio will depend on effectively addressing the specific concerns raised by WATKINS, NATHANIEL WILLIAM in the 1 pending office action.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WATKINS, NATHANIEL WILLIAM | 1 | 70.5% | +25.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18500078 | FOLDABLE ELECTRIC BICYCLE | WATKINS, NATHANIEL WILLIAM | 2d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18500078 | FOLDABLE ELECTRIC BICYCLE | WATKINS, NATHANIEL WILLIAM | 2d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3617 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18500078 | FOLDABLE ELECTRIC BICYCLE | WATKINS, NATHANIEL WILLIAM | 3617 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 2d overdue | Pending | Nov 01, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial