Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

DASSAULT SYSTEMES

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

9 pending office actions • 7 art units • 8 examiners • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

DASSAULT SYSTEMES maintains 7 pending office actions within the Computing & Software technology area. The prosecution is distributed, spanning 6 distinct art units and 6 distinct examiners. This distribution suggests that the company's software innovations are being reviewed across a range of technical specialties within the patent office. Managing 7 pending office actions across such a wide array of departments requires an approach to response preparation that accounts for different standards.

JAY B HANN is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently managing 2 pending office actions. While HANN handles a larger share than others, the remaining actions are spread among the other examiners. This diversity in examiners and art units requires a prosecution strategy that addresses the standards across different software-related departments. Because the pending office actions are not concentrated under a single individual, the company faces a variety of examination styles. The presence of the distinct examiners ensures that the portfolio's progress is not tied to the timeline or tendencies of a single official.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
1
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

8
Hard (89%)
1
Medium (11%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only2 (22%)
§101 + other3 (33%)
§103 only1 (11%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
4
Information Tech
44% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
2
Business / Other
22% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HANN, JAY B 2 61.1% +31.9%
N'DURE, AMIE MERCEDES 1 78.2% +15.1%
LOUIS, RICHARD G 1 74.7% +17.2%
MISIASZEK, AMBER ALTSCHUL 1 46.9% +24.3%
MARKS, AARIC R 1 — —
SAXENA, AKASH 1 49.1% +30.5%
TAMIRU, ABRHAM ALEHEGN 1 0.0% +0.0%
MOLL, NITHYA JANAKIRAMAN 1 67.3% +13.4%

Hard Cases (8)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17735198 MANAGING ITERATIONS AND BRANCHING IN DESIGN MOLL, NITHYA JANAKIRAMAN 85d overdue
18072947 Universal Wall Boundary Condition Treatment for K-Omega Turbulence Models HANN, JAY B 7d
18063338 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSESSING ERGONOMIC RISK TAMIRU, ABRHAM ALEHEGN 30d
18885013 Computer System for Computer Aided Design (CAD) Modeling of a Mitral Valve LOUIS, RICHARD G —
18390174 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSESSING DYNAMIC ERGONOMIC RISK MISIASZEK, AMBER ALTSCHUL —
18326284 Simulation methodology for Fuel Cell stacks using RVE technique MARKS, AARIC R —
18321837 Method for Parametrized Multi-compartment Housing Model Creation SAXENA, AKASH —
18162764 Computer simulation methodology to analyze mass, momentum, energy and charge transport in a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell HANN, JAY B —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17735198 MANAGING ITERATIONS AND BRANCHING IN DESIGN MOLL, NITHYA JANAKIRAMAN 85d overdue
18072947 Universal Wall Boundary Condition Treatment for K-Omega Turbulence Models HANN, JAY B 7d
19061060 Systems and Methods for Determining Properties of a Wellbore N'DURE, AMIE MERCEDES —
18885013 Computer System for Computer Aided Design (CAD) Modeling of a Mitral Valve LOUIS, RICHARD G —
18390174 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSESSING DYNAMIC ERGONOMIC RISK MISIASZEK, AMBER ALTSCHUL —
18321837 Method for Parametrized Multi-compartment Housing Model Creation SAXENA, AKASH —
18162764 Computer simulation methodology to analyze mass, momentum, energy and charge transport in a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell HANN, JAY B —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3645 1
3771 1
3682 1
2187 1
2188 1
2186 1
2189 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19061060 Systems and Methods for Determining Properties of a Wellbore N'DURE, AMIE MERCEDES 3645 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 24, 2025
18885013 Computer System for Computer Aided Design (CAD) Modeling of a Mitral Valve LOUIS, RICHARD G 3771 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 13, 2024
18390174 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSESSING DYNAMIC ERGONOMIC RISK MISIASZEK, AMBER ALTSCHUL 3682 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 20, 2023
18326284 Simulation methodology for Fuel Cell stacks using RVE technique MARKS, AARIC R — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 31, 2023
18321837 Method for Parametrized Multi-compartment Housing Model Creation SAXENA, AKASH — §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 23, 2023
18162764 Computer simulation methodology to analyze mass, momentum, energy and charge transport in a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell HANN, JAY B 2187 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 01, 2023
18063338 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSESSING ERGONOMIC RISK TAMIRU, ABRHAM ALEHEGN 2188 §101§103 Final Rejection 30d Pending Dec 08, 2022
18072947 Universal Wall Boundary Condition Treatment for K-Omega Turbulence Models HANN, JAY B 2186 §101 Final Rejection 7d Pending Dec 01, 2022
17735198 MANAGING ITERATIONS AND BRANCHING IN DESIGN MOLL, NITHYA JANAKIRAMAN 2189 §101§102§112 Final Rejection 85d overdue Pending May 03, 2022

Managing DASSAULT SYSTEMES's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month