Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

DASSAULT SYSTEMES

8 pending office actions • 6 art units • 8 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
1
Due this week
4
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (4)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (25%)
5
Medium (62%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (12%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only2 (25%)
§103 only4 (50%)
§102 only1 (12%)
No statute on record1 (12%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
6
Information Tech
75% of docket
1
Communications
12% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
12% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
RICHER, AARON M 1 51.3% +21.4%
TAMIRU, ABRHAM ALEHEGN 1
HANN, JAY B 1 60.8% +34.1%
MOLL, NITHYA JANAKIRAMAN 1 67.2% +13.6%
LEATHERS, EMILY GORMAN 1 66.7% +40.0%
KNIGHT, LETORIA G 1 27.7% +48.2%
COOK, BRIAN S 1 61.6% +29.8%
COTHRAN, BERNARD E 1 45.5% +15.5%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17361639 System and Method for Updating Real-Time Project Status Based on Deliverable Status KNIGHT, LETORIA G 156d overdue
18072947 Universal Wall Boundary Condition Treatment for K-Omega Turbulence Models HANN, JAY B 7d

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17361639 System and Method for Updating Real-Time Project Status Based on Deliverable Status KNIGHT, LETORIA G 156d overdue
17735198 MANAGING ITERATIONS AND BRANCHING IN DESIGN MOLL, NITHYA JANAKIRAMAN 85d overdue
17455260 Internal Generation of Contact Entities to Model Contact Behavior in Simulations Involving Non-Circular Beam Elements LEATHERS, EMILY GORMAN 42d overdue
18072947 Universal Wall Boundary Condition Treatment for K-Omega Turbulence Models HANN, JAY B 7d
16235424 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR STABILITY-BASED CONSTRAINED NUMERICAL CALIBRATION OF MATERIAL MODELS COTHRAN, BERNARD E 21d
17011088 Method and Apparatus for Automatic Underhood Thermal Modeling COOK, BRIAN S 27d
18644176 Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Sedimentary Rocks based on a Grain to Grain Parametric Cohesive Contact Model RICHER, AARON M 28d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2188 2
2187 2
2617 1
2186 1
2189 1
3623 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18644176 Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Sedimentary Rocks based on a Grain to Grain Parametric Cohesive Contact Model RICHER, AARON M 2617 Other Non-Final OA 28d Pending Apr 24, 2024
18063338 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSESSING ERGONOMIC RISK TAMIRU, ABRHAM ALEHEGN 2188 §103 Non-Final OA 30d Pending Dec 08, 2022
18072947 Universal Wall Boundary Condition Treatment for K-Omega Turbulence Models HANN, JAY B 2186 §101 Non-Final OA 7d Pending Dec 01, 2022
17735198 MANAGING ITERATIONS AND BRANCHING IN DESIGN MOLL, NITHYA JANAKIRAMAN 2189 §102 Non-Final OA 85d overdue Pending May 03, 2022
17455260 Internal Generation of Contact Entities to Model Contact Behavior in Simulations Involving Non-Circular Beam Elements LEATHERS, EMILY GORMAN 2187 §103 Non-Final OA 42d overdue Pending Nov 17, 2021
17361639 System and Method for Updating Real-Time Project Status Based on Deliverable Status KNIGHT, LETORIA G 3623 §101 Non-Final OA 156d overdue Pending Jun 29, 2021
17011088 Method and Apparatus for Automatic Underhood Thermal Modeling COOK, BRIAN S 2187 §103 Non-Final OA 27d Pending Sep 03, 2020
16235424 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR STABILITY-BASED CONSTRAINED NUMERICAL CALIBRATION OF MATERIAL MODELS COTHRAN, BERNARD E 2188 §103 Final Rejection 21d Pending Dec 28, 2018

Managing DASSAULT SYSTEMES's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month