Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Datapelago Inc. manages a portfolio in the Computing & Software technology area. There is currently 1 pending office action associated with the company. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, EWALD, JOHN ROBERT DAKITA. This indicates that the company's current prosecution efforts are centralized, with all active matters resting with 1 individual.
The prosecution activity is situated within 1 distinct art unit. EWALD, JOHN ROBERT DAKITA is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, holding 1 pending office action. The presence of only 1 pending action across 1 art unit reflects a specific point of engagement with the patent office. For practitioners, this concentration means that the prosecution strategy does not need to account for varying examiner behaviors across different art units. The focus remains on navigating the requirements of 1 distinct art unit and the specific feedback from the assigned examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| EWALD, JOHN ROBERT DAKITA | 1 | 76.7% | +49.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18541993 | System and Method for Computation Workload Processing | EWALD, JOHN ROBERT DAKITA | 2d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2199 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18541993 | System and Method for Computation Workload Processing | EWALD, JOHN ROBERT DAKITA | 2199 | §103 | Final Rejection | 2d overdue | Pending | Dec 15, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial