Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Datum Point Labs Inc.

Technology area: Communications

11 pending office actions • 5 art units • 11 examiners • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Datum Point Labs Inc. manages 12 pending office actions within the Communications technology area. These actions are spread across 6 distinct art units, indicating that the company's patent filings cover a broad spectrum of communication technologies. The prosecution workload is distributed among 12 distinct examiners, which means that every pending matter is currently being reviewed by a different person at the USPTO.

MICHAEL ALAN FOSTER JR. is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, yet he handles only 1 pending office action. This total lack of concentration among the 12 distinct examiners suggests that the company must navigate a highly fragmented examination environment. With 6 distinct art units involved, the company's legal strategy must be adaptable to the different standards and practices of multiple administrative divisions.

The presence of 12 pending office actions and an equal number of examiners highlights the diversity of the company's current prosecution efforts. Because no individual examiner holds more than 1 pending office action, the portfolio's success is distributed across a wide range of individual officials. This requires a robust management system to ensure that the company's communications-related innovations are prosecuted consistently across the various art units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
9
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (45%)
6
Medium (55%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other3 (27%)
§103 only6 (55%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (18%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
9% of docket
4
Communications
36% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
9% of docket
5
Business / Other
45% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
FOSTER JR., MICHAEL ALAN 1 — —
PEDAPATI, CHANDHANA 1 77.8% +15.0%
COLUCCI, MICHAEL C 1 75.8% +15.3%
KOLB JR, BRETT DAVID 1 — —
LE, DEBBIE M 1 89.5% +10.4%
BALAKRISHNAN, VIJAY MURALI 1 40.7% +73.3%
POUNCIL, DARNELL A 1 21.4% +30.7%
LI, RAYMOND CHUN LAM 1 100.0% +0.0%
LE, SARAH 1 67.5% +31.8%
SOLAIMAN, FOUZIA HYE 1 65.7% +55.4%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18946726 EFFICIENT RAG MODEL FOR MEDICAL APPLICATIONS LE, DEBBIE M —
18625844 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMAGE TO 3D GENERATION LI, RAYMOND CHUN LAM —

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19067066 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USER INTERACTIONS FOSTER JR., MICHAEL ALAN —
18953686 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MULTI-DOMAIN FACIAL LANDMARK DETECTION PEDAPATI, CHANDHANA —
18626959 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GESTURE GENERATION FROM TEXT AND NON-SPEECH BALAKRISHNAN, VIJAY MURALI —
18627298 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MULTI-PARTY TRANSACTIONS POUNCIL, DARNELL A —
18625491 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR 3D-AWARE IMAGE GENERATION LE, SARAH —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18604278 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TEXT-TO-SPEECH SYNTHESIS SOLAIMAN, FOUZIA HYE 63d
18953686 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MULTI-DOMAIN FACIAL LANDMARK DETECTION PEDAPATI, CHANDHANA —
18953970 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SPEECH GENERATION BY EMOTIONAL VOICE CONVERSION COLUCCI, MICHAEL C —
18946726 EFFICIENT RAG MODEL FOR MEDICAL APPLICATIONS LE, DEBBIE M —
18626959 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GESTURE GENERATION FROM TEXT AND NON-SPEECH BALAKRISHNAN, VIJAY MURALI —
18627298 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MULTI-PARTY TRANSACTIONS POUNCIL, DARNELL A —
18625491 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR 3D-AWARE IMAGE GENERATION LE, SARAH —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2614 2
2168 1
3622 1
2653 1
2691 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19067066 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USER INTERACTIONS FOSTER JR., MICHAEL ALAN — §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 28, 2025
18953686 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MULTI-DOMAIN FACIAL LANDMARK DETECTION PEDAPATI, CHANDHANA — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 20, 2024
18953970 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SPEECH GENERATION BY EMOTIONAL VOICE CONVERSION COLUCCI, MICHAEL C — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 20, 2024
18954233 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FEATURE DROPOUT KNOWLEDGE DISTILLATION KOLB JR, BRETT DAVID — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 20, 2024
18946726 EFFICIENT RAG MODEL FOR MEDICAL APPLICATIONS LE, DEBBIE M 2168 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 13, 2024
18626959 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GESTURE GENERATION FROM TEXT AND NON-SPEECH BALAKRISHNAN, VIJAY MURALI — §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 04, 2024
18627298 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MULTI-PARTY TRANSACTIONS POUNCIL, DARNELL A 3622 §101§102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 04, 2024
18625844 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMAGE TO 3D GENERATION LI, RAYMOND CHUN LAM 2614 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 03, 2024
18625491 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR 3D-AWARE IMAGE GENERATION LE, SARAH 2614 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 03, 2024
18604278 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TEXT-TO-SPEECH SYNTHESIS SOLAIMAN, FOUZIA HYE 2653 §103 Non-Final OA 63d Pending Mar 13, 2024
18582292 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AI ENABLED DELIVERY OF USER SPECIFIC SERVICES NGUYEN, PHUNG HOANG JOSEPH 2691 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 20, 2024

Managing Datum Point Labs Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month