Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
The patent portfolio for David Stefano Zolesi is currently focused on a single pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This prosecution activity is confined to 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a specific technical focus for the current filings. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner involved, the outcome of the current pending matter rests entirely with a single individual at the patent office. This singular focus suggests that the entity is pursuing a specific technological advancement rather than a broad array of innovations.
BREIER, KRYSTINE E is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. This represents the entirety of the active prosecution for the entity. For the practitioner, this means that the immediate success of the portfolio depends on navigating the specific requirements and interpretation of this one examiner. The alignment of 1 pending action with 1 art unit and 1 examiner indicates a narrow point of engagement with the patent office at this time. With only 1 distinct examiner involved in the current cycle, the individual examiner's past behavior is the primary data point for strategy.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BREIER, KRYSTINE E | 1 | 82.4% | +8.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19049716 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR LOCATING A FIREARM | BREIER, KRYSTINE E | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3645 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19049716 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR LOCATING A FIREARM | BREIER, KRYSTINE E | 3645 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 10, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialDavid Stefano Zolesi has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Krystine E Breier has the most, with 1 of David Stefano Zolesi's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
