Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Dayn Amade Inventions Ltd. is currently navigating 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This prosecution is handled by 1 distinct examiner across 1 distinct art unit. The busiest examiner for the company is DOSHER, JULIE GRACE, who is assigned 1 pending office action. The data indicates a very narrow prosecution front, where the current case is the only active matter reported.
The involvement of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the technology being pursued is currently confined to a specific niche within Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. For the practitioner, the primary focus is the specific examiner, DOSHER, JULIE GRACE, as they manage the only active case. This concentration in 1 distinct examiner simplifies the monitoring process but increases the impact of that single examiner's decisions on the overall portfolio. Without additional pending actions, the company lacks a baseline for comparing prosecution efficiency. Success in this technology area depends entirely on the resolution of the single case currently under review by the assigned examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DOSHER, JULIE GRACE | 1 | 34.8% | +65.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18685315 | Amphibious Mobile Classroom System | DOSHER, JULIE GRACE | 73d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18685315 | Amphibious Mobile Classroom System | DOSHER, JULIE GRACE | 73d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3715 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18685315 | Amphibious Mobile Classroom System | DOSHER, JULIE GRACE | 3715 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 73d overdue | Pending | Feb 21, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial