Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026

Decked LLC

4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
2
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due later (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LARSON, JUSTIN MATTHEW 2 56.5% +22.5%
SMALLEY, JAMES N 1 70.6% -10.0%
MAI, TRI M 1 36.2% +20.5%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18736989 SINGLE-HAND LATCH MECHANISM WITH SLAM CLOSE SMALLEY, JAMES N 42d overdue
18631893 SINGLE MOTION UNLATCH AND OPEN LATCH MECHANISM MAI, TRI M

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18461420 VEHICLE STORAGE SYSTEM LARSON, JUSTIN MATTHEW 79d
18358298 VEHICLE STORAGE SYSTEM LARSON, JUSTIN MATTHEW 79d
18631893 SINGLE MOTION UNLATCH AND OPEN LATCH MECHANISM MAI, TRI M

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3733 2
3734 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18736989 SINGLE-HAND LATCH MECHANISM WITH SLAM CLOSE SMALLEY, JAMES N 3733 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 42d overdue Pending Jun 07, 2024
18631893 SINGLE MOTION UNLATCH AND OPEN LATCH MECHANISM MAI, TRI M 3733 §102§103 Non-Final OA Pending Apr 10, 2024
18461420 VEHICLE STORAGE SYSTEM LARSON, JUSTIN MATTHEW 3734 §103 Non-Final OA 79d Pending Sep 05, 2023
18358298 VEHICLE STORAGE SYSTEM LARSON, JUSTIN MATTHEW 3734 §103 Non-Final OA 79d Pending Jul 25, 2023

Managing Decked LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month