Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Networking & Security
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Deep Bio Inc. currently has 1 pending office action in the Networking & Security technology area. This prosecution is being handled by 1 distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit. This concentration suggests that the company's current patent office activity is focused on a single matter or a narrow set of claims within the Networking & Security field.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is SHAW, PETER C, who is managing the 1 pending office action. Since there is only 1 distinct examiner involved, the company's immediate success depends on addressing the specific requirements of SHAW, PETER C. The presence of only 1 distinct art unit means the company does not have to manage the varying procedural standards of multiple units at this time.
With 1 pending office action assigned to SHAW, PETER C, the administrative tracking for Deep Bio Inc. is straightforward. SHAW, PETER C, as the busiest examiner with 1 pending action, represents the entirety of the company's current pending workload. This profile, featuring 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, indicates a highly focused prosecution state for the 1 pending office action currently on file.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHAW, PETER C | 1 | 76.3% | +35.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18271233 | METHOD FOR TRAINING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK PROVIDING DETERMINATION RESULT OF PATHOLOGICAL SPECIMEN, AND COMPUTING SYSTEM FOR PERFORMING SAME | SHAW, PETER C | 16d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18271233 | METHOD FOR TRAINING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK PROVIDING DETERMINATION RESULT OF PATHOLOGICAL SPECIMEN, AND COMPUTING SYSTEM FOR PERFORMING SAME | SHAW, PETER C | 16d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2493 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18271233 | METHOD FOR TRAINING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK PROVIDING DETERMINATION RESULT OF PATHOLOGICAL SPECIMEN, AND COMPUTING SYSTEM FOR PERFORMING SAME | SHAW, PETER C | 2493 | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | 16d overdue | Pending | Jul 06, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial