Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Deepwell Dtx is currently navigating 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company's prosecution is divided, with 2 distinct examiners and distinct art units involved in the review process. This ratio of actions to examiners and art units suggests that each application is being treated as a separate technical and administrative entity without overlap. The pending office actions represent the current breadth of the company's engagement with the patent office.
MARY EVANGELINE BARR is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, holding 1 busiest examiner pending office action. With the pending office actions in total, the workload is evenly split between the distinct examiners. Practitioners should be prepared for distinct procedural experiences across the distinct art units, as the lack of centralization may lead to different examination timelines or prior art interpretations. Because there are distinct examiners and art units, the company cannot rely on a shared point of contact or a unified administrative standard. This requires a multi-track strategy to address the specific requirements of each pending matter within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (50%) |
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BARR, MARY EVANGELINE | 1 | 35.8% | +32.6% |
| BROCKINGTON III, WILLIAM S | 1 | 42.2% | +54.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18962404 | FDA COMPLIANT QUALITY SYSTEM TO RISK-MITIGATE, DEVELOP, AND MAINTAIN SOFTWARE-BASED MEDICAL SYSTEMS | BROCKINGTON III, WILLIAM S | 30d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18962404 | FDA COMPLIANT QUALITY SYSTEM TO RISK-MITIGATE, DEVELOP, AND MAINTAIN SOFTWARE-BASED MEDICAL SYSTEMS | BROCKINGTON III, WILLIAM S | 30d overdue |
| 19000211 | DIGITALLY GUIDED PREHAB EXPERIENCES | BARR, MARY EVANGELINE | 17d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3682 | 1 |
| 3623 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19000211 | DIGITALLY GUIDED PREHAB EXPERIENCES | BARR, MARY EVANGELINE | 3682 | §103 | Final Rejection | 17d overdue | Pending | Dec 23, 2024 |
| 18962404 | FDA COMPLIANT QUALITY SYSTEM TO RISK-MITIGATE, DEVELOP, AND MAINTAIN SOFTWARE-BASED MEDICAL SYSTEMS | BROCKINGTON III, WILLIAM S | 3623 | §101Other | Non-Final OA | 30d overdue | Pending | Nov 27, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial