Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Dendrogenix

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (33%)
1
Easy (33%)
1
Unknown (33%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
§112 only1 (33%)
No statute on record1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KUCKLA, ANNA GRACE 2 50.0% +53.3%
SEITZ, ANTHONY JOSEPH 1 67.7% +28.1%

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18265186 PRODRUG OF 5a-HYDROXY-6ß-[2-(1H-IMIDAZOL-4-YL)ETHYLAMINO]CHOLESTAN-3ß-OL AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING SAME FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF CANCER SEITZ, ANTHONY JOSEPH 22d overdue
17631773 COMPOSITION COMPRISING STEROL DERIVATIVES FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF A NEURONAL PATHOLOGY RELATED TO HYPOXIA, HYPOGLYCEMIA AND/OR HYPERGLYCEMIA KUCKLA, ANNA GRACE 22d overdue
18034317 5ALPHA-HYDROXY-6BETA-[2-(1-H-IMIDAZOL-4-YL)-ETHYLAMINO]-CHOLESTAN-3BETA-OL ANALOGUES AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING SAME FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF CANCER KUCKLA, ANNA GRACE

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1626 2
1629 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18265186 PRODRUG OF 5a-HYDROXY-6ß-[2-(1H-IMIDAZOL-4-YL)ETHYLAMINO]CHOLESTAN-3ß-OL AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING SAME FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF CANCER SEITZ, ANTHONY JOSEPH 1629 §112Other Final Rejection 22d overdue Pending Jun 02, 2023
18034317 5ALPHA-HYDROXY-6BETA-[2-(1-H-IMIDAZOL-4-YL)-ETHYLAMINO]-CHOLESTAN-3BETA-OL ANALOGUES AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING SAME FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF CANCER KUCKLA, ANNA GRACE 1626 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Apr 27, 2023
17631773 COMPOSITION COMPRISING STEROL DERIVATIVES FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF A NEURONAL PATHOLOGY RELATED TO HYPOXIA, HYPOGLYCEMIA AND/OR HYPERGLYCEMIA KUCKLA, ANNA GRACE 1626 Other Final Rejection 22d overdue Pending Jan 31, 2022

Managing Dendrogenix's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month