Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Denvelops Textiles S L currently has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, WEYDEMEYER, ALICIA JANE, and is being handled within 1 distinct art unit. The company's current prosecution activity is focused on this single matter, representing its only active interaction with the USPTO.
WEYDEMEYER, ALICIA JANE is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, holding 1 pending office action. As the sole examiner with an active case for the company, she is the primary official responsible for the current prosecution of their pending intellectual property. The use of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the technology is being evaluated within a specific framework related to chemistry or materials.
With 1 pending office action to address, Denvelops Textiles S L can concentrate its resources on the specific requirements of WEYDEMEYER, ALICIA JANE. The simplicity of having 1 examiner and 1 art unit reduces the administrative complexity of the patent process. Practitioners should focus on the specific technical standards of the Chemistry & Materials sector to move this application forward within its assigned art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WEYDEMEYER, ALICIA JANE | 1 | 46.2% | +27.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18706926 | WALL LINING MESH | WEYDEMEYER, ALICIA JANE | 16d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1781 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18706926 | WALL LINING MESH | WEYDEMEYER, ALICIA JANE | 1781 | §103 | Final Rejection | 16d | Pending | May 02, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial