Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Deuer Development is currently navigating the patent prosecution process within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company's portfolio shows 1 pending office action, which represents the current active challenge for its intellectual property strategy. This level of activity reflects the current filings in the transportation sector.
The examination of these filings is concentrated within 1 distinct art unit and is overseen by 1 distinct examiner. This lack of distribution across multiple units or personnel indicates that the technical subject matter is contained. Such a structure allows for a direct interaction with the patent office during the review of the pending application.
MORRIS, TAYLOR L is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio and is currently managing 1 pending office action. As the examiner involved, the feedback from MORRIS, TAYLOR L is a factor determining the outcome of the company's current prosecution efforts. Practitioners should tailor their responses to the specific technical requirements demonstrated by this examiner.
With 1 distinct examiner, the prosecution environment is defined by this specific count. The focus remains on resolving the issues raised within the 1 distinct art unit to advance the company's interests in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. This prosecution environment provides a path for addressing the current patent office requirements.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MORRIS, TAYLOR L | 1 | 59.5% | +35.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18726634 | SAFE ACCESS SYSTEM | MORRIS, TAYLOR L | 40d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18726634 | SAFE ACCESS SYSTEM | MORRIS, TAYLOR L | 40d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3631 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18726634 | SAFE ACCESS SYSTEM | MORRIS, TAYLOR L | 3631 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | 40d | Pending | Jul 03, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial