Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Dgci Corporation

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Dgci Corporation is managing 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This action involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This concentrated focus indicates a specific technical path for the company's current prosecution effort. By operating within 1 art unit, the company maintains a narrow procedural footprint at the patent office. This structure allows the legal team to focus their resources on the requirements of a specific technical group within the Chemistry & Materials field.

BOYER, RANDY is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending office action. This 1 action represents the total number of pending office actions for the company. As the only examiner with a pending action, this individual's review constitutes the entirety of the company's current active prosecution. For the practitioner, understanding the specific preferences of BOYER, RANDY is the primary factor in the current prosecution strategy. The outcome of the 1 pending office action will be determined by the review and feedback provided by this identified examiner.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BOYER, RANDY 1 70.4% +8.2%

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1771 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18525262 MOBILE HYDROCARBON REFINERIES AND RELATED METHODS BOYER, RANDY 1771 §103 Non-Final OA 44d overdue Pending Nov 30, 2023

Managing Dgci Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month