Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Diehl Aerospace GmbH manages a company patent portfolio in the Communications technology area. The portfolio currently shows 1 pending office action. This single action represents the current scope of the company's active interactions with patent examiners.
The prosecution is concentrated in 1 distinct art unit and involves 1 distinct examiner. With 1 pending office action assigned to 1 examiner, the company's current legal focus is restricted to a single technical area. This simplifies the management of the portfolio's active files by reducing the number of administrative contacts.
AZIMA, SHAGHAYEGH is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 busiest examiner pending office action. As the only examiner listed, their specific approach to the 1 distinct art unit will be the primary factor in the company's prosecution results. The company's current strategy is entirely focused on the review conducted by this single examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AZIMA, SHAGHAYEGH | 1 | 81.1% | +13.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18121067 | AUTOMATIC AND GUIDED INTERIOR INSPECTION | AZIMA, SHAGHAYEGH | 27d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18121067 | AUTOMATIC AND GUIDED INTERIOR INSPECTION | AZIMA, SHAGHAYEGH | 27d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2671 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18121067 | AUTOMATIC AND GUIDED INTERIOR INSPECTION | AZIMA, SHAGHAYEGH | 2671 | §103 | Final Rejection | 27d | Pending | Mar 14, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial