Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Diehl Aviation Hamburg GmbH currently manages 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, indicating a highly focused prosecution effort. BONZELL, PHILIP J is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, overseeing 1 pending office action. The outcome of the company's current patent filing is therefore entirely dependent on the examination practices and decisions of this specific individual.
The involvement of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the technology is categorized within a specialized administrative group of Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. For the practitioner, this means that prosecution strategy must be tailored to the specific norms and prior art search patterns of that unit. Since BONZELL, PHILIP J is the only examiner currently handling a pending matter for Diehl Aviation Hamburg GmbH, their historical data regarding allowance rates and interview receptivity will be the most important factor in the prosecution process.
With 1 pending office action, there is no opportunity to compare different examiner responses or art unit efficiencies within the current portfolio. The practitioner should focus on building a clear record with the assigned examiner to resolve the 1 pending office action. Because the portfolio is concentrated in a single art unit, understanding the specific preferences of that group is essential for advancing the patent objectives of Diehl Aviation Hamburg GmbH.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BONZELL, PHILIP J | 1 | 78.6% | +12.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18180177 | INTEGRATED PARTITION WALL ARRANGEMENT HAVING A CABIN ATTENDANT SEAT, CARRIER STRUCTURE AND METHODS FOR PRODUCING AND DESIGNING A CARRIER STRUCTURE OR A PARTITION WALL ARRANGEMENT | BONZELL, PHILIP J | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18180177 | INTEGRATED PARTITION WALL ARRANGEMENT HAVING A CABIN ATTENDANT SEAT, CARRIER STRUCTURE AND METHODS FOR PRODUCING AND DESIGNING A CARRIER STRUCTURE OR A PARTITION WALL ARRANGEMENT | BONZELL, PHILIP J | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3642 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18180177 | INTEGRATED PARTITION WALL ARRANGEMENT HAVING A CABIN ATTENDANT SEAT, CARRIER STRUCTURE AND METHODS FOR PRODUCING AND DESIGNING A CARRIER STRUCTURE OR A PARTITION WALL ARRANGEMENT | BONZELL, PHILIP J | 3642 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 08, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialDiehl Aviation Hamburg GmbH has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Philip J Bonzell has the most, with 1 of Diehl Aviation Hamburg GmbH's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
