Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Dieta Inc. is currently managing 1 pending office action in the Communications technology area. This activity involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, indicating a focused prosecution profile. This concentration suggests that the company's current patent filings are being evaluated within a single specialized technical group at the patent office.
MAHROUKA, WASSIM is the busiest examiner, responsible for the 1 pending office action. With only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the company's immediate patent strategy is tied to a single point of review. This singular point of contact simplifies the management of the portfolio, as there are no competing requirements from different reviewers. Practitioners should focus on building a consistent dialogue with this examiner to efficiently resolve the 1 pending office action and move the application toward a final determination within the 1 distinct art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAHROUKA, WASSIM | 1 | 86.1% | +7.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18572148 | System and Method for Determining a Stool Condition | MAHROUKA, WASSIM | 66d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2665 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18572148 | System and Method for Determining a Stool Condition | MAHROUKA, WASSIM | 2665 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 66d overdue | Pending | Dec 19, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial