Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Dig Insights Inc. maintains a patent portfolio in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. Currently, there is 1 pending office action for the company. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and a distinct art unit, reflecting a focused approach to its current patent prosecution. This concentration suggests that the company is currently prioritizing a specific innovation that falls within a specific technical category at the patent office.
BOND, REED MADISON is the busiest examiner for Dig Insights Inc., with 1 pending office action. This examiner is the only one currently reviewing the company's applications. The prosecution is highly focused, with all active matters residing in a specific art unit under the examiner's supervision. For the practitioner, this means that the outcome of the current prosecution is entirely dependent on the interaction with this specific examiner. Understanding the examiner's past decisions and the specific nuances of the art unit will be essential for successfully navigating the office action and securing patent protection. This focused approach requires a high degree of coordination to ensure all technical aspects of the invention are fully addressed.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BOND, REED MADISON | 1 | 11.5% | +28.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18336647 | System and Method for Consumer Choice Modeling | BOND, REED MADISON | 98d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18336647 | System and Method for Consumer Choice Modeling | BOND, REED MADISON | 98d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3624 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18336647 | System and Method for Consumer Choice Modeling | BOND, REED MADISON | 3624 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | 98d overdue | Pending | Jun 16, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial