Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Digipharm Ltd. is currently managing 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is being processed by 1 distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a highly specific focus for the company's current patent office interactions. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the current prosecution effort is entirely concentrated in one specific area of the patent office.
TRISTAN ISAAC EVANS is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, with 1 pending office action under his management. This single action constitutes the total of 1 pending office actions for the company. Practitioners should note that the 1 pending office action is entirely under the review of TRISTAN ISAAC EVANS. This concentration means that the examiner's specific interpretation of the 1 distinct art unit's guidelines will be the primary factor in the prosecution's outcome.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| EVANS, TRISTAN ISAAC | 1 | 33.9% | +55.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18671873 | COMPUTER SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING EFFICACY OF A MEDICAL TREATMENT FOR A MEDICAL CONDITION | EVANS, TRISTAN ISAAC | 132d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18671873 | COMPUTER SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING EFFICACY OF A MEDICAL TREATMENT FOR A MEDICAL CONDITION | EVANS, TRISTAN ISAAC | 132d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3683 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18671873 | COMPUTER SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING EFFICACY OF A MEDICAL TREATMENT FOR A MEDICAL CONDITION | EVANS, TRISTAN ISAAC | 3683 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | 132d overdue | Pending | May 22, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial