Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (25%) |
| No statute on record | 3 (75%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER, KATHERINE | 1 | 26.5% | +32.5% |
| NGUYEN, KHAI MINH | 1 | 87.2% | +4.3% |
| SAHLE, MAHIDERE S | 1 | 79.4% | +12.9% |
| THIRUGNANAM, GANDHI | 1 | 73.9% | +11.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18976114 | Systems for Detecting and Identifying Coincident Conditions | KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER, KATHERINE | 71d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18622593 | Dynamic Adjustment of Flash Intensity Based on Retinal Pigmentation | SAHLE, MAHIDERE S | 113d overdue |
| 18976114 | Systems for Detecting and Identifying Coincident Conditions | KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER, KATHERINE | 71d overdue |
| 18367384 | AUTONOMOUS DIAGNOSIS OF A DISORDER IN A PATIENT FROM IMAGE ANALYSIS | THIRUGNANAM, GANDHI | 9d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3687 | 1 |
| 2641 | 1 |
| 2872 | 1 |
| 2672 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18976114 | Systems for Detecting and Identifying Coincident Conditions | KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER, KATHERINE | 3687 | Other | Non-Final OA | 71d overdue | Pending | Dec 10, 2024 |
| 18757298 | DIRECT MEDICAL TREATMENT PREDICTIONS USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | NGUYEN, KHAI MINH | 2641 | Other | Non-Final OA | 104d overdue | Pending | Jun 27, 2024 |
| 18622593 | Dynamic Adjustment of Flash Intensity Based on Retinal Pigmentation | SAHLE, MAHIDERE S | 2872 | Other | Non-Final OA | 113d overdue | Pending | Mar 29, 2024 |
| 18367384 | AUTONOMOUS DIAGNOSIS OF A DISORDER IN A PATIENT FROM IMAGE ANALYSIS | THIRUGNANAM, GANDHI | 2672 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 9d | Pending | Sep 12, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial