Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| RZECZYCKI, PHILLIP MATTHEW | 1 | 63.0% | +39.1% |
| BOWLES, DAVID PAUL | 1 | 69.4% | +25.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18269973 | COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INDUCING DEFECATION | RZECZYCKI, PHILLIP MATTHEW | 78d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18269973 | COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INDUCING DEFECATION | RZECZYCKI, PHILLIP MATTHEW | 78d overdue |
| 18248452 | COMPOSITIONS FOR INDUCING URINARY VOIDING AND DEFECATION | BOWLES, DAVID PAUL | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1625 | 1 |
| 1654 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18269973 | COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INDUCING DEFECATION | RZECZYCKI, PHILLIP MATTHEW | 1625 | §102§103§112Other | Non-Final OA | 78d overdue | Pending | Jun 28, 2023 |
| 18248452 | COMPOSITIONS FOR INDUCING URINARY VOIDING AND DEFECATION | BOWLES, DAVID PAUL | 1654 | §103DP | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 10, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial