Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Dilax Intelcom GmbH currently has 1 pending office action within the Communications technology area. The prosecution landscape for this company is very narrow, featuring 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This suggests that the company's current patent applications are focused on a specific communication technology that falls under a single area of expertise at the patent office.
The busiest examiner is LU, ZHIYU, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This 1 examiner manages the entirety of the company's current pending workload, making their individual examination practices the primary concern for the company's legal representatives. With only 1 distinct art unit involved, there is no variation in the technical standards being applied to the portfolio, ensuring a consistent prosecution environment.
The prosecution strategy is centered on the 1 pending office action, and the outcome depends heavily on the dialogue with LU, ZHIYU. Practitioners should analyze the examiner's past actions in the Communications field to identify the most effective arguments. Resolving the 1 pending office action with this 1 examiner is the most direct way for Dilax Intelcom GmbH to advance its patent portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LU, ZHIYU | 1 | 48.9% | +14.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2665 | 1 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial