4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 13 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 4 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PYO, MONICA M | 1 | 83.0% | +35.3% |
| HO, THOMAS Y | 1 | 16.1% | +30.7% |
| CONTRERAS, CIEL P | 1 | 54.2% | +33.6% |
| PEO, JONATHAN M | 1 | 48.5% | +48.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18737638 | INSTRUMENT AGNOSTIC TEMPLATE SYSTEM FOR DATA COLLECTION | PYO, MONICA M | 27d |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18327746 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LAB MANAGEMENT | HO, THOMAS Y | 30d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18067711 | METHOD FOR THE SEPARATION OF ANIONIC, CATIONIC, NEUTRAL AND ZWITTERIONIC ARSENIC SPECIES | PEO, JONATHAN M | 2d overdue |
| 18167979 | ELECTROLYTIC ELUENT GENERATORS | CONTRERAS, CIEL P | 20d |
| 18737638 | INSTRUMENT AGNOSTIC TEMPLATE SYSTEM FOR DATA COLLECTION | PYO, MONICA M | 27d |
| 18327746 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LAB MANAGEMENT | HO, THOMAS Y | 30d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2161 | 1 |
| 3624 | 1 |
| 1794 | 1 |
| 1779 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18737638 | INSTRUMENT AGNOSTIC TEMPLATE SYSTEM FOR DATA COLLECTION | PYO, MONICA M | 2161 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 27d | Pending | Jun 07, 2024 |
| 18327746 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LAB MANAGEMENT | HO, THOMAS Y | 3624 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 30d | Pending | Jun 01, 2023 |
| 18167979 | ELECTROLYTIC ELUENT GENERATORS | CONTRERAS, CIEL P | 1794 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 20d | Pending | Feb 13, 2023 |
| 18067711 | METHOD FOR THE SEPARATION OF ANIONIC, CATIONIC, NEUTRAL AND ZWITTERIONIC ARSENIC SPECIES | PEO, JONATHAN M | 1779 | §103 | Final Rejection | 2d overdue | Pending | Dec 18, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial