Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Direct Biologics LLC

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Direct Biologics LLC currently manages 5 pending office actions in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These 5 actions are spread across 4 distinct art units, indicating a varied technical focus for their pending matters. The prosecution involves 5 distinct examiners, which means that every single pending office action is being handled by a different individual at the USPTO.

NIEBAUER, RONALD T is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. This matches the workload of every other examiner involved, as there are 5 distinct examiners for the 5 pending office actions. There is no examiner concentration in this portfolio, requiring a unique approach for each pending matter.

The 4 distinct art units involved show that the company's 5 pending office actions are not concentrated in a single technical group. Practitioners must be prepared to navigate the specific requirements of 4 different art units and the individual styles of 5 different examiners. The lack of overlap among the 5 distinct examiners means that no single examiner's past decisions will necessarily predict the outcome of other pending actions. This distribution across 4 distinct art units highlights the specialized nature of the pending portfolio in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals field.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
3
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (25%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (25%)
Double-patenting + other2 (50%)
No statute on record1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MCCORMICK, CATHERINE LYNN 1 52.3% +39.8%
KIM, TAEYOON 1 51.4% +52.2%
GOLDBERG, JEANINE ANNE 1 45.4% +40.5%
ROGERS, ERIC JASON 1 56.9% +33.2%

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17427192 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR DEVELOPING TARGET SPECIFIC EXOSOME AND GROWTH FACTOR PRODUCTS GOLDBERG, JEANINE ANNE 126d overdue
18340765 ORAL DELIVERY OF THERAPEUTIC MAMMALIAN CELLS MCCORMICK, CATHERINE LYNN 54d
17606514 METHOD FOR THE TREATMENT OF PERIODONTAL DISEASE USING CHARACTERIZED MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL GROWTH FACTORS AND EXOSOMES KIM, TAEYOON —
17418342 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING SKIN AND HAIR DISORDERS ROGERS, ERIC JASON —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1638 2
1631 1
1682 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18340765 ORAL DELIVERY OF THERAPEUTIC MAMMALIAN CELLS MCCORMICK, CATHERINE LYNN 1638 Other Non-Final OA 54d Pending Jun 23, 2023
17606514 METHOD FOR THE TREATMENT OF PERIODONTAL DISEASE USING CHARACTERIZED MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL GROWTH FACTORS AND EXOSOMES KIM, TAEYOON 1631 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 26, 2021
17427192 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR DEVELOPING TARGET SPECIFIC EXOSOME AND GROWTH FACTOR PRODUCTS GOLDBERG, JEANINE ANNE 1682 §103§112DP Non-Final OA 126d overdue Pending Jul 30, 2021
17418342 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING SKIN AND HAIR DISORDERS ROGERS, ERIC JASON 1638 §102§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 25, 2021

Managing Direct Biologics LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Direct Biologics LLC have?

Direct Biologics LLC has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Direct Biologics LLC applications?

Catherine Lynn Mccormick has the most, with 1 of Direct Biologics LLC's pending office actions.

What technology area are Direct Biologics LLC's patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month