1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Dispendix GmbH currently has 1 pending office action in its patent portfolio. This action is assigned to SIEFKE, SAMUEL P, who is the busiest examiner for the company with 1 pending action. The prosecution is handled by 1 distinct examiner, which represents the total number of examiners currently reviewing the company's active applications. This indicates a concentrated prosecution environment for the 1 pending office action.
The data shows that SIEFKE, SAMUEL P is responsible for the entirety of the company's current pending workload. With 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner, the company's immediate patent outcomes are dependent on this individual's review. There are 0 distinct art units listed, which suggests that the current action is not yet categorized within the standard technical divisions provided in the data.
Practitioners should note that the workload under SIEFKE, SAMUEL P means there is no current distribution of work across multiple examiners. The focus on a single examiner for the pending action highlights the importance of understanding this specific examiner's history. Because there is 1 distinct examiner involved, the company's current interactions with the USPTO are centralized, and the 0 distinct art units indicate a unique status in the portfolio data.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIEFKE, SAMUEL P | 1 | 63.0% | +17.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18573128 | WELL CARRIER DEVICE FOR A DISPENSING DEVICE | SIEFKE, SAMUEL P | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18573128 | WELL CARRIER DEVICE FOR A DISPENSING DEVICE | SIEFKE, SAMUEL P | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18573128 | WELL CARRIER DEVICE FOR A DISPENSING DEVICE | SIEFKE, SAMUEL P | — | §102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 21, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialDispendix GmbH has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 0 art units and 1 examiners.
Samuel P Siefke has the most, with 1 of Dispendix GmbH's pending office actions.
