Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Disruptive Dealings LLC maintains a company patent portfolio in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. There is 1 pending office action currently active. This 1 pending office action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, reflecting a focused prosecution environment for the company's current patent filings. Having 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner means the company's immediate patenting success relies on the specific review of 1 individual within the patent office.
Prosecution is occurring within 1 distinct art unit. GLESSNER, BRIAN E is the busiest examiner, holding 1 busiest examiner pending office action. With 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit, the company's current patent office engagement is highly focused. This concentration suggests that the company is pursuing a specific innovation within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field. Because there is only 1 pending office action, the company's immediate patenting goals are tied to the review of the 1 distinct examiner. This focus in 1 distinct art unit allows the company to tailor its prosecution strategy to the specific expectations and prior art interpretations of the 1 distinct examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GLESSNER, BRIAN E | 1 | 35.7% | +26.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18739250 | Antiballistic Window Retrofitting Apparatus and Method | GLESSNER, BRIAN E | 83d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3633 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18739250 | Antiballistic Window Retrofitting Apparatus and Method | GLESSNER, BRIAN E | 3633 | §103DP | Final Rejection | 83d | Pending | Jun 10, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial