Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026

Dizal Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Dizal Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. This single action is being handled by 1 distinct examiner, SCHMIDT, IZABELA MARIA. The concentration of work is absolute, as 1 distinct art unit contains the entirety of the portfolio's active prosecution. SCHMIDT, IZABELA MARIA is identified as the busiest examiner for the company, also accounting for 1 busiest examiner pending action.

This indicates a highly focused prosecution stage where all current activity is channeled through a single point of contact at the patent office. Practitioners can expect a streamlined communication path given the lack of diversity in assigned personnel. The alignment of the busiest examiner with the only pending action suggests that the company's immediate patent strategy is entirely dependent on the outcomes from this specific individual. Furthermore, the presence of 1 distinct art unit implies that the technical subject matter is tightly defined within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector. This singular art unit assignment simplifies the consistency of legal arguments across the portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (100%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SCHMIDT, IZABELA MARIA 1 65.3% +42.5%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18473282 ERBB/BTK INHIBITORS SCHMIDT, IZABELA MARIA 26d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1621 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18473282 ERBB/BTK INHIBITORS SCHMIDT, IZABELA MARIA 1621 §112Other Non-Final OA 26d Pending Sep 25, 2023

Managing Dizal Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month