Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Docsnap Inc. currently manages a patent portfolio concentrated within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The portfolio shows a highly focused prosecution strategy, as evidenced by the presence of only 1 pending office action. This single action is distributed across 1 distinct art unit, indicating a narrow technical scope for the company's current intellectual property efforts.
The prosecution work is handled by 1 distinct examiner, WRIGHT, KRYSTEN NIKOLE. Because WRIGHT, KRYSTEN NIKOLE is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action, the entirety of the company's active USPTO engagement rests with this individual. For a practitioner, this concentration means that the outcome of the portfolio's current pending status depends entirely on the specific requirements of this single examiner within the 1 distinct art unit.
This streamlined structure suggests that Docsnap Inc. is not currently navigating a high volume of simultaneous disputes. The presence of 1 pending office action reflects a manageable workload for the legal team. Practitioners should note that the 1 distinct examiner involved will have a singular influence on the immediate development of the company's Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems assets.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LONG, FONYA M | 1 | 3.4% | +0.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18794666 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PATIENT HEALTHCARE UTILITY | LONG, FONYA M | 22d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3682 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18794666 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PATIENT HEALTHCARE UTILITY | LONG, FONYA M | 3682 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 22d | Pending | Aug 05, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial