10 pending office actions • 5 art units • 10 examiners • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 13 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (10%) |
| §101 + other | 5 (50%) |
| §103 only | 2 (20%) |
| §112 only | 1 (10%) |
| Double-patenting only | 1 (10%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WILSON, KIMBERLY LOVEL | 1 | 70.9% | +16.8% |
| MOLNAR, HUNTER A | 1 | 50.8% | +32.6% |
| WALLICK, STEPHANIE SHOSHANA | 1 | 29.7% | +36.3% |
| SIMPSON, DIONE N | 1 | 32.8% | +31.9% |
| OBAID, FATEH M | 1 | 67.8% | +35.5% |
| GREGORY, BERNARR E | 1 | 90.5% | +6.8% |
| KRINGEN, MICHELLE THERESE | 1 | 55.6% | +38.9% |
| BARGEON, BRITTANY E | 1 | 45.0% | +33.7% |
| NGUYEN, NHAT HUY T | 1 | 53.6% | +23.4% |
| SULLIVAN, THOMAS J | 1 | 27.4% | +21.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18906063 | SYSTEMS FOR AUTONOMOUS AND AUTOMATED DELIVERY VEHICLES TO COMMUNICATE WITH THIRD PARTIES | GREGORY, BERNARR E | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18830281 | FOOD DELIVERY OPTIMIZATION | KRINGEN, MICHELLE THERESE | 45d overdue |
| 18296916 | MACHINE LEARNING PLATFORM FOR OPTIMIZED PROVIDER DETERMINATION AND PROCESSING | NGUYEN, NHAT HUY T | 26d overdue |
| 19072540 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING USING WEIGHT DATA | WALLICK, STEPHANIE SHOSHANA | 17d overdue |
| 19348142 | DATABASE QUERY METHOD IN CENTRALIZED INFRASTRUCTURE | WILSON, KIMBERLY LOVEL | — |
| 19202873 | EFFICIENT AND ACCURATE RETURN PACKAGE DELIVERIES WITH DISTRIBUTED FLEET | MOLNAR, HUNTER A | — |
| 18147801 | AUTOMATED CART GENERATION | SULLIVAN, THOMAS J | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18830281 | FOOD DELIVERY OPTIMIZATION | KRINGEN, MICHELLE THERESE | 45d overdue |
| 18360204 | ITEM AGGREGATION WITH DATA CONVERSION | BARGEON, BRITTANY E | 38d overdue |
| 18296916 | MACHINE LEARNING PLATFORM FOR OPTIMIZED PROVIDER DETERMINATION AND PROCESSING | NGUYEN, NHAT HUY T | 26d overdue |
| 19072540 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING USING WEIGHT DATA | WALLICK, STEPHANIE SHOSHANA | 17d overdue |
| 19348142 | DATABASE QUERY METHOD IN CENTRALIZED INFRASTRUCTURE | WILSON, KIMBERLY LOVEL | — |
| 19202873 | EFFICIENT AND ACCURATE RETURN PACKAGE DELIVERIES WITH DISTRIBUTED FLEET | MOLNAR, HUNTER A | — |
| 18982207 | API FOR REMOTE MONITORING OF APPLICATION INTERACTION | SIMPSON, DIONE N | — |
| 18915497 | DYNAMIC DETECTION OF USER APPLICATION EVENTS | OBAID, FATEH M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3628 | 2 |
| 3689 | 2 |
| 2165 | 1 |
| 3688 | 1 |
| 2147 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19348142 | DATABASE QUERY METHOD IN CENTRALIZED INFRASTRUCTURE | WILSON, KIMBERLY LOVEL | 2165 | §101§102§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 02, 2025 |
| 19202873 | EFFICIENT AND ACCURATE RETURN PACKAGE DELIVERIES WITH DISTRIBUTED FLEET | MOLNAR, HUNTER A | — | §101§103§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 08, 2025 |
| 19072540 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING USING WEIGHT DATA | WALLICK, STEPHANIE SHOSHANA | 3628 | §101§103DP | Final Rejection | 17d overdue | Pending | Mar 06, 2025 |
| 18982207 | API FOR REMOTE MONITORING OF APPLICATION INTERACTION | SIMPSON, DIONE N | 3628 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 16, 2024 |
| 18915497 | DYNAMIC DETECTION OF USER APPLICATION EVENTS | OBAID, FATEH M | — | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 15, 2024 |
| 18906063 | SYSTEMS FOR AUTONOMOUS AND AUTOMATED DELIVERY VEHICLES TO COMMUNICATE WITH THIRD PARTIES | GREGORY, BERNARR E | — | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 03, 2024 |
| 18830281 | FOOD DELIVERY OPTIMIZATION | KRINGEN, MICHELLE THERESE | 3689 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 45d overdue | Pending | Sep 10, 2024 |
| 18360204 | ITEM AGGREGATION WITH DATA CONVERSION | BARGEON, BRITTANY E | 3688 | §103 | Final Rejection | 38d overdue | Pending | Jul 27, 2023 |
| 18296916 | MACHINE LEARNING PLATFORM FOR OPTIMIZED PROVIDER DETERMINATION AND PROCESSING | NGUYEN, NHAT HUY T | 2147 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 26d overdue | Pending | Apr 06, 2023 |
| 18147801 | AUTOMATED CART GENERATION | SULLIVAN, THOMAS J | 3689 | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 29, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial