Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Doowon Heavy Industrial Co. Ltd. currently has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct art unit, reflecting the company's focus on heavy industrial and mechanical technology. The prosecution is currently limited to this single active matter. The presence of only 1 pending matter indicates a streamlined prosecution phase for the company's current patent filings.
The company's workload is managed by 1 distinct examiner. TADESSE, MARTHA is the busiest examiner, with 1 busiest examiner pending action. This examiner is the sole person responsible for reviewing the company's current pending application. This concentration of 1 pending office action under 1 distinct examiner in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering field allows for a very focused legal strategy.
Because TADESSE, MARTHA is the sole examiner, her specific history and preferences will determine the success of the 1 busiest examiner pending action. This lack of examiner diversity reduces the complexity of managing the portfolio's current active matters. Practitioners can focus their resources on addressing the specific concerns of this 1 distinct examiner within the 1 distinct art unit. This targeted approach is essential for resolving the current 1 pending office action efficiently.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TADESSE, MARTHA | 1 | 67.2% | +14.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18676600 | CABIN COOLING/HEATING SYSTEM FOR A VEHICLE | TADESSE, MARTHA | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3763 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18676600 | CABIN COOLING/HEATING SYSTEM FOR A VEHICLE | TADESSE, MARTHA | 3763 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 29, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial