Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Dr Gholam Peyman maintains a patent portfolio focused on the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The company currently has 1 pending office action. This single active matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is being processed within 1 distinct art unit. This represents a highly centralized prosecution profile with no current diversification across different examiners or technical units.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is LOPEZ, LESLIE ANN, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. As this is the only pending action in the company's portfolio, this examiner's decisions will be the primary factor in the company's immediate patent outcomes. The concentration in 1 distinct art unit suggests that the current filing is situated within a specific technical specialty. Practitioners should focus on the specific examination history of this examiner to anticipate the trajectory of the pending application.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LOPEZ, LESLIE ANN | 1 | 65.6% | +34.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18662925 | Optical Implant And Methods Of Implantation | LOPEZ, LESLIE ANN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18662925 | Optical Implant And Methods Of Implantation | LOPEZ, LESLIE ANN | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3774 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18662925 | Optical Implant And Methods Of Implantation | LOPEZ, LESLIE ANN | 3774 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 13, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialDr Gholam Peyman has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Leslie Ann Lopez has the most, with 1 of Dr Gholam Peyman's pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
