Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 4 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GANESAN, SUNDHARA M | 1 | 70.3% | +25.6% |
| HAMILTON, MATTHEW L | 1 | 53.5% | +61.4% |
| BULLINGTON, ROBERT P | 1 | 42.7% | +30.3% |
| HOLCOMB, MARK | 1 | 33.5% | +40.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18087813 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WORKOUT GUIDE APPARATUS AND METHOD | HOLCOMB, MARK | 31d overdue |
| 18704444 | AI EXERCISE GUIDE DEVICE AND METHOD | GANESAN, SUNDHARA M | — |
| 18704055 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING AI EXERCISE SEQUENCE | HAMILTON, MATTHEW L | — |
| 18702787 | AI EXERCISE GUIDE DEVICE AND METHOD | BULLINGTON, ROBERT P | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18087813 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WORKOUT GUIDE APPARATUS AND METHOD | HOLCOMB, MARK | 31d overdue |
| 18704444 | AI EXERCISE GUIDE DEVICE AND METHOD | GANESAN, SUNDHARA M | — |
| 18704055 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING AI EXERCISE SEQUENCE | HAMILTON, MATTHEW L | — |
| 18702787 | AI EXERCISE GUIDE DEVICE AND METHOD | BULLINGTON, ROBERT P | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3784 | 1 |
| 3682 | 1 |
| 3715 | 1 |
| 3792 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18704444 | AI EXERCISE GUIDE DEVICE AND METHOD | GANESAN, SUNDHARA M | 3784 | §101§102§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 24, 2024 |
| 18704055 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING AI EXERCISE SEQUENCE | HAMILTON, MATTHEW L | 3682 | §101§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 24, 2024 |
| 18702787 | AI EXERCISE GUIDE DEVICE AND METHOD | BULLINGTON, ROBERT P | 3715 | §101§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 18, 2024 |
| 18087813 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WORKOUT GUIDE APPARATUS AND METHOD | HOLCOMB, MARK | 3792 | §101§112 | Non-Final OA | 31d overdue | Pending | Dec 23, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial