Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Drsya Technologies Private Limited

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

3 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Drsya Technologies Private Limited is managing 3 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are handled by 2 distinct examiners within 1 distinct art unit. This concentration in a single art unit suggests a focused technical scope for the pending applications. For the applicant, this means that the 3 pending office actions are likely related to similar technology, which may allow for some efficiency in responding to examiner concerns within the 1 distinct art unit.

The busiest examiner, WARNER, PHILIP N, is responsible for 2 pending office actions. This accounts for 2 of the 3 total pending office actions. With 2 distinct examiners involved, the company is dealing with a majority of its workload under a single reviewer while also managing 1 action with another examiner. Practitioners should focus on the specific tendencies of WARNER, PHILIP N, as this examiner has a significant influence over the portfolio's current status. The presence of 3 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area indicates an active phase of prosecution for the company's current filings.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only3 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WARNER, PHILIP N 2 38.1% +29.2%
EL-BATHY, MOHAMED N 1 28.9% +32.2%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18820285 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING INFLUENCING FACTORS OF NET PROMOTER SCORE WARNER, PHILIP N 71d
18813097 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ESTIMATING IMPACT OF CUSTOMER SENTIMENT ON NET PROMOTER SCORE WARNER, PHILIP N —
18795238 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING EFFECT OF PROMOTERS AND DETRACTORS ON NET CUSTOMER ACQUISITION EL-BATHY, MOHAMED N —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18820285 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING INFLUENCING FACTORS OF NET PROMOTER SCORE WARNER, PHILIP N 71d
18813097 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ESTIMATING IMPACT OF CUSTOMER SENTIMENT ON NET PROMOTER SCORE WARNER, PHILIP N —
18795238 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING EFFECT OF PROMOTERS AND DETRACTORS ON NET CUSTOMER ACQUISITION EL-BATHY, MOHAMED N —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3624 3

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18820285 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING INFLUENCING FACTORS OF NET PROMOTER SCORE WARNER, PHILIP N 3624 §101 Final Rejection 71d Pending Aug 30, 2024
18813097 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ESTIMATING IMPACT OF CUSTOMER SENTIMENT ON NET PROMOTER SCORE WARNER, PHILIP N 3624 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 23, 2024
18795238 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING EFFECT OF PROMOTERS AND DETRACTORS ON NET CUSTOMER ACQUISITION EL-BATHY, MOHAMED N 3624 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 06, 2024

Managing Drsya Technologies Private Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month