Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Dsrptv LLC is currently managing 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is located within 1 distinct art unit. The current prosecution landscape for this portfolio is highly focused, with all activity concentrated in a single administrative and technical domain at the patent office.
The busiest examiner for the company is ERB, NATHAN, who is handling 1 busiest examiner pending action. This figure matches the total of 1 pending office actions for Dsrptv LLC. Consequently, the outcome of the company's current patenting efforts depends on the specific feedback and requirements of this 1 examiner within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field, rather than a diverse group of officials.
The presence of 1 distinct art unit indicates that the pending technology falls into a specific sub-category of mechanical or e-commerce systems. With only 1 distinct examiner involved, there is no need to coordinate across different examination styles or timelines. This allows for a streamlined response to the 1 pending office action, ensuring that all legal resources are focused on a single set of procedural requirements.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ERB, NATHAN | 1 | 51.4% | +0.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18733820 | PRODUCT ORDER MANAGEMENT | ERB, NATHAN | 41d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3628 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18733820 | PRODUCT ORDER MANAGEMENT | ERB, NATHAN | 3628 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 41d | Pending | Jun 04, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial