Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Dualdraw LLC has 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The count of 1 pending office action matches the count of 1 distinct examiner. This matter is the only one currently active within the 1 distinct art unit.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is SHAO, PHILLIP Y: this individual is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because the total pending office actions and the busiest examiner pending count are both 1, this examiner handles the total volume of the company's active matters. The prosecution is subject to the review of this examiner within the Chemistry & Materials sector. Practitioners should observe that the 1 distinct examiner is the same individual as the busiest examiner. The outcome of the pending office action will impact the status of the portfolio in this technology area. This busiest examiner pending action represents the total current engagement with the patent office.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHAO, PHILLIP Y | 1 | 75.3% | +23.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18597633 | SCISSOR MECHANISM CLAMPING ASSEMBLY FOR A FILTER COMPARTMENT | SHAO, PHILLIP Y | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18597633 | SCISSOR MECHANISM CLAMPING ASSEMBLY FOR A FILTER COMPARTMENT | SHAO, PHILLIP Y | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1776 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18597633 | SCISSOR MECHANISM CLAMPING ASSEMBLY FOR A FILTER COMPARTMENT | SHAO, PHILLIP Y | 1776 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Mar 06, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial