Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Dynatrace LLC

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 14 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Dynatrace LLC has 5 pending office actions in Computing & Software. The portfolio includes 5 distinct examiners and 5 distinct art units, so each pending matter is represented in a separate examiner and art unit setting.

CONYERS, DAWAUNE A is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. Counsel should maintain coordinated portfolio positions while developing matter-specific responses to the different examination records.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (20%)
4
Medium (80%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (20%)
§103 only4 (80%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
4
Information Tech
80% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
20% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CONYERS, DAWAUNE A 1 65.7% +19.3%
MCFARLAND-BARNES, KELAH JANAE 1 80.0% +8.3%
EDWARDS, LINGLAN E 1 69.9% +23.9%
PATEL, HIREN P 1 78.8% +35.6%
KONERU, SUJAY 1 58.1% +37.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18929739 Semantic Analysis Of Session Data MCFARLAND-BARNES, KELAH JANAE 8d

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18646865 Optimizing Cloud-Based IT-Systems Towards Business Objectives: Automatic Topology-Based Analysis To Determine Impact Of IT-Systems On Business Metrics KONERU, SUJAY 8d

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18646865 Optimizing Cloud-Based IT-Systems Towards Business Objectives: Automatic Topology-Based Analysis To Determine Impact Of IT-Systems On Business Metrics KONERU, SUJAY 8d
19022088 Interactive Development Of Database Queries CONYERS, DAWAUNE A 70d
18768207 Runtime Patching Methods For Achieving Cyber Deception In Software Applications EDWARDS, LINGLAN E —
18761833 Codeshield - A Scalable, Performant And Secure Execution Environment For Custom Code PATEL, HIREN P —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2152 1
2431 1
2408 1
2196 1
3624 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19022088 Interactive Development Of Database Queries CONYERS, DAWAUNE A 2152 §103 Final Rejection 70d Pending Jan 15, 2025
18929739 Semantic Analysis Of Session Data MCFARLAND-BARNES, KELAH JANAE 2431 §103 Final Rejection 8d Pending Oct 29, 2024
18768207 Runtime Patching Methods For Achieving Cyber Deception In Software Applications EDWARDS, LINGLAN E 2408 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 10, 2024
18761833 Codeshield - A Scalable, Performant And Secure Execution Environment For Custom Code PATEL, HIREN P 2196 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 02, 2024
18646865 Optimizing Cloud-Based IT-Systems Towards Business Objectives: Automatic Topology-Based Analysis To Determine Impact Of IT-Systems On Business Metrics KONERU, SUJAY 3624 §101§103 Final Rejection 8d Pending Apr 26, 2024

Managing Dynatrace LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Dynatrace LLC have?

Dynatrace LLC has 5 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 5 art units and 5 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Dynatrace LLC applications?

Dawaune A Conyers has the most, with 1 of Dynatrace LLC's pending office actions.

What technology area are Dynatrace LLC's patent applications in?

Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month