Technology areas: Computing & Software • Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 15 patents granted in the last 365 days
Dynatrace LLC maintains a portfolio in the Computing & Software technology area with 4 pending office actions. These actions are spread across distinct examiners, meaning each pending matter is being evaluated by a different official. This distribution provides the company with a variety of examiner perspectives across its active applications, ensuring that no single individual's interpretation dominates the entire pending portfolio.
The workload is further divided among 3 distinct art units, showing some technical breadth within the software domain. The busiest examiner is CONYERS, DAWAUNE A, who is currently handling 1 busiest examiner pending action. Given the total of 4 pending office actions, the workload is evenly distributed, and no single examiner holds most of the company's pending cases. This decentralized structure suggests that Dynatrace LLC is pursuing a diverse set of software innovations that are being reviewed by a broad group of patent office specialists.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (25%) |
| §103 only | 3 (75%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CONYERS, DAWAUNE A | 1 | 65.7% | +19.3% |
| EDWARDS, LINGLAN E | 1 | 69.9% | +23.9% |
| PATEL, HIREN P | 1 | 78.9% | +36.2% |
| KONERU, SUJAY | 1 | 58.2% | +37.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18646865 | Optimizing Cloud-Based IT-Systems Towards Business Objectives: Automatic Topology-Based Analysis To Determine Impact Of IT-Systems On Business Metrics | KONERU, SUJAY | 8d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18646865 | Optimizing Cloud-Based IT-Systems Towards Business Objectives: Automatic Topology-Based Analysis To Determine Impact Of IT-Systems On Business Metrics | KONERU, SUJAY | 8d |
| 19022088 | Interactive Development Of Database Queries | CONYERS, DAWAUNE A | 70d |
| 18768207 | Runtime Patching Methods For Achieving Cyber Deception In Software Applications | EDWARDS, LINGLAN E | — |
| 18761833 | Codeshield - A Scalable, Performant And Secure Execution Environment For Custom Code | PATEL, HIREN P | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2152 | 1 |
| 2408 | 1 |
| 3624 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19022088 | Interactive Development Of Database Queries | CONYERS, DAWAUNE A | 2152 | §103 | Final Rejection | 70d | Pending | Jan 15, 2025 |
| 18768207 | Runtime Patching Methods For Achieving Cyber Deception In Software Applications | EDWARDS, LINGLAN E | 2408 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jul 10, 2024 |
| 18761833 | Codeshield - A Scalable, Performant And Secure Execution Environment For Custom Code | PATEL, HIREN P | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 02, 2024 |
| 18646865 | Optimizing Cloud-Based IT-Systems Towards Business Objectives: Automatic Topology-Based Analysis To Determine Impact Of IT-Systems On Business Metrics | KONERU, SUJAY | 3624 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 8d | Pending | Apr 26, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial