Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Dynavap LLC currently has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This single active case is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is being processed within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a very streamlined prosecution profile where all current efforts are focused on a single technical matter within the chemistry sector.
The busiest examiner identified is NGUYEN, SONNY V, who is responsible for the 1 busiest examiner pending office action. As there is only 1 pending office action in the portfolio, NGUYEN, SONNY V is the only examiner the company is currently working with at the USPTO. This allows for a highly targeted prosecution strategy, as the applicant can focus entirely on the specific feedback and procedural preferences of 1 distinct examiner and the standards of 1 distinct art unit.
The concentration of the portfolio in Chemistry & Materials under 1 distinct examiner means that the outcome of the 1 pending office action will significantly impact the company's immediate intellectual property position. Practitioners should focus on the specific prior art and technical arguments relevant to NGUYEN, SONNY V. Resolving the 1 busiest examiner pending office action efficiently is the primary goal, given the lack of other active matters in the single art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NGUYEN, SONNY V | 1 | 36.5% | +27.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17385437 | TIP & ASSEMBLY FOR THERMAL EXTRACTION DEVICE | NGUYEN, SONNY V | 23d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17385437 | TIP & ASSEMBLY FOR THERMAL EXTRACTION DEVICE | NGUYEN, SONNY V | 23d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1700 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17385437 | TIP & ASSEMBLY FOR THERMAL EXTRACTION DEVICE | NGUYEN, SONNY V | 1700 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 23d | Pending | Jul 26, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial