Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
E F A Engineering For All Ltd. is currently managing 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The prosecution of this portfolio is handled by 1 distinct examiner, which shows a centralized approach to the company's active patent filings. This focus indicates that the company's current intellectual property efforts are directed toward a specific chemical or material innovation.
The data indicates that the prosecution is confined to 1 distinct art unit. BOWERS, NATHAN ANDREW is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 pending office action currently under review. Since there is only 1 pending office action in total, this examiner is the sole point of contact for the company's active matters in the Chemistry & Materials sector.
Practitioners should observe that having 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit reduces the complexity of the prosecution strategy. The workload of 1 pending office action for BOWERS, NATHAN ANDREW represents the entirety of the company's current engagement with the patent office. This allows for a concentrated effort to meet the specific standards and expectations of the examiner within the Chemistry & Materials technology area.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BOWERS, NATHAN ANDREW | 1 | 59.5% | +31.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18704555 | Micromixer and Method for Concentration Measurement of Unknown Sample | BOWERS, NATHAN ANDREW | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18704555 | Micromixer and Method for Concentration Measurement of Unknown Sample | BOWERS, NATHAN ANDREW | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1799 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18704555 | Micromixer and Method for Concentration Measurement of Unknown Sample | BOWERS, NATHAN ANDREW | 1799 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 25, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialE F A Engineering For All Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Nathan Andrew Bowers has the most, with 1 of E F A Engineering For All Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
