Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
E-Sentience Inc. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is being handled by 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a concentrated effort on a specific technical advancement. The focus on a single art unit suggests that the company's current patenting activity is limited to a narrow mechanical or medical field.
The presence of 1 distinct examiner for the 1 pending office action simplifies the prosecution process by providing a single point of contact at the patent office. This eliminates the need to coordinate across different examiner styles or administrative procedures. Practitioners can focus their efforts on addressing the specific technical concerns raised within the 1 distinct art unit.
DIETZ, NOE ROBERT is the busiest examiner for the company, responsible for 1 pending office action. With 1 busiest examiner pending, this individual's examination decisions will directly impact the company's immediate patent goals. The 1 pending office action represents the entire current pending workload for E-Sentience Inc. as tracked in this profile.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIETZ, NOE ROBERT | 1 | 0.0% | +0.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18316796 | REAL-TIME STRESS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WITH STRESS DETECTION SENSOR AND BIOFEEDBACK LOOP ACTUATOR | DIETZ, NOE ROBERT | 70d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3791 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18316796 | REAL-TIME STRESS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WITH STRESS DETECTION SENSOR AND BIOFEEDBACK LOOP ACTUATOR | DIETZ, NOE ROBERT | 3791 | §103 | Final Rejection | 70d | Pending | May 12, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial