Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
E6Pr S A P I De C V currently maintains 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This matter is handled by MINSKEY, JACOB T, who is the busiest examiner for the portfolio with 1 pending office action. The company's prosecution efforts are currently limited to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. Having 1 pending office action total indicates a very specific focus for the company's current patenting activities.
The fact that MINSKEY, JACOB T is the only examiner involved means that the applicant can dedicate its full attention to the specific issues raised in this case. This concentration within 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's innovations in Chemistry & Materials are being evaluated through a single technical lens. This streamlined environment can lead to more predictable prosecution timelines and a more cohesive patent strategy. For the practitioner, this represents an opportunity to engage deeply with a single examiner's perspective without the distraction of competing office actions. The outcome of this prosecution will likely set the tone for the company's future filings in this technology area. By resolving the concerns of a single examiner, the company can establish a clear path for its intellectual property in the chemistry sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Double-patenting only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MINSKEY, JACOB T | 1 | 69.2% | +33.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18331761 | Edible Multi-Ring Can-Holder and Methods for Manufacturing Edible Can-Holders | MINSKEY, JACOB T | 107d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1748 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18331761 | Edible Multi-Ring Can-Holder and Methods for Manufacturing Edible Can-Holders | MINSKEY, JACOB T | 1748 | DP | Final Rejection | 107d overdue | Pending | Jun 08, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialE6Pr S A P I De C V has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Jacob T Minskey has the most, with 1 of E6Pr S A P I De C V's pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
