Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Eae Elektrik Asansor Endustrisi Insaat Sanayi Ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi currently manages 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This single active matter is concentrated under 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, indicating a highly focused prosecution footprint at this stage. The lack of departmental variety suggests that the portfolio's current momentum is tied to a specific technological niche or a single patent family. This concentration in 1 distinct art unit simplifies the administrative oversight required for the company's current filings.
The busiest examiner for the company is HOLIZNA, CALEB ANDREW, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because this examiner handles the company's entire current workload, the outcome of this specific interaction will define the immediate success rate for the portfolio. Practitioners should monitor this single art unit for precedents that might affect the 1 pending office action, as there are no other active cases to provide internal comparison. This singular focus means that the company's immediate patenting objectives are centralized within a single regulatory channel at the patent office.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HOLIZNA, CALEB ANDREW | 1 | 65.5% | +36.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18044363 | METHOD FOR FORMING CONTACT SURFACES BY PEELING THE INSULATION ON THE INSULATED CONDUCTOR BARS FOR ENERGY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS | HOLIZNA, CALEB ANDREW | 157d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3723 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18044363 | METHOD FOR FORMING CONTACT SURFACES BY PEELING THE INSULATION ON THE INSULATED CONDUCTOR BARS FOR ENERGY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS | HOLIZNA, CALEB ANDREW | 3723 | §103 | Final Rejection | 157d overdue | Pending | Mar 07, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial