Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Earthlite LLC has 1 pending office action currently active in its portfolio. This 1 pending office action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, concentrating the company's current legal efforts. The data indicates 0 distinct art units, suggesting that the active case may be in a preliminary or specialized stage of the patent office's review process. This lack of art unit assignment indicates that the prosecution is not currently distributed across different technical departments.
JENNESS, NATHAN JAY is the busiest examiner for the company, holding 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because JENNESS, NATHAN JAY is the only 1 distinct examiner involved, the company's immediate patent prospects are determined by this individual's assessment. This focused activity reflects a very specific and limited scope for the company's current prosecution pipeline. The reliance on 1 distinct examiner for the total 1 pending office action means that the company's immediate intellectual property growth is entirely dependent on the resolution of this one specific case by JENNESS, NATHAN JAY, with 0 distinct art units providing alternative paths.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| JENNESS, NATHAN JAY | 1 | 53.8% | +37.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19085738 | LIGHT TREATMENT ASSEMBLY FOR USE WITHIN A SUPPORT DEVICE | JENNESS, NATHAN JAY | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19085738 | LIGHT TREATMENT ASSEMBLY FOR USE WITHIN A SUPPORT DEVICE | JENNESS, NATHAN JAY | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19085738 | LIGHT TREATMENT ASSEMBLY FOR USE WITHIN A SUPPORT DEVICE | JENNESS, NATHAN JAY | — | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 20, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial