Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Eastech (Huizhou) Co. Ltd. is currently prosecuting 2 pending office actions within the Communications technology area. These matters are distributed across 2 distinct art units, suggesting that the company's communications technologies involve different specialized technical categories. This distribution requires the applicant to address the specific examination standards of multiple separate units within the patent office.
The portfolio involves distinct examiners, with each examiner handling one of the active matters. NEECE, DYLAN MAGUIRE is the busiest examiner, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. With 2 examiners and 2 art units for the pending actions, the company's current prosecution landscape is fully diversified. This means that each application is being treated as a unique case with no overlap in personnel or technical units, requiring a tailored approach for each response in the Communications sector. This high degree of specialization across a small number of actions indicates a diverse technical approach where each matter is assigned 1 pending action.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEECE, DYLAN MAGUIRE | 1 | 82.4% | +20.7% |
| HUBER, PAUL W | 1 | 84.9% | +9.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18757519 | LOUDSPEAKER SYSTEM AND PASSIVE RADIATOR MODULE THEREOF | HUBER, PAUL W | 79d |
| 18805554 | SPEAKER AND VOICE COIL MODULE THEREOF | NEECE, DYLAN MAGUIRE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18805554 | SPEAKER AND VOICE COIL MODULE THEREOF | NEECE, DYLAN MAGUIRE | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2692 | 1 |
| 2691 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18805554 | SPEAKER AND VOICE COIL MODULE THEREOF | NEECE, DYLAN MAGUIRE | 2692 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Aug 15, 2024 |
| 18757519 | LOUDSPEAKER SYSTEM AND PASSIVE RADIATOR MODULE THEREOF | HUBER, PAUL W | 2691 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 79d | Pending | Jun 28, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial