Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Ebawe Anlagentechnik GmbH

Technology areas: Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Ebawe Anlagentechnik GmbH currently maintains 2 pending office actions within the Communications technology area. The prosecution workload is distributed across 2 distinct examiners, requiring the applicant to manage different sets of examiner preferences. This structure suggests that each pending matter is being handled by a separate individual, which may lead to varying outcomes across the portfolio.

The prosecution also involves multiple art units, matching the number of examiners and pending actions. This alignment indicates that each case is being reviewed within a different administrative group at the USPTO. The busiest examiner identified is SHERMAN, STEPHEN G, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because the workload is spread evenly, no single examiner's approach will dictate the success of the entire portfolio.

With the pending matters residing in different art units, the company must navigate the specific examination standards of multiple specialized divisions. The diversity of examiners relative to the small number of actions suggests a decentralized prosecution strategy. Practitioners should focus on the individual requirements of SHERMAN, STEPHEN G while preparing for a unique set of challenges in the other pending action.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
50% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SHERMAN, STEPHEN G 1 82.3% +16.8%
BUCKLE JR, JAMES J 1 65.6% +14.9%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18888743 COMPUTERIZED METHOD FOR MEASURING A PRODUCTION PALLET FOR PRECAST CONCRETE COMPONENT PARTS AND/OR A COMPONENT ARRANGED ON THE PRODUCTION PALLET SHERMAN, STEPHEN G —
18763101 TURNING DEVICE BUCKLE JR, JAMES J —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18888743 COMPUTERIZED METHOD FOR MEASURING A PRODUCTION PALLET FOR PRECAST CONCRETE COMPONENT PARTS AND/OR A COMPONENT ARRANGED ON THE PRODUCTION PALLET SHERMAN, STEPHEN G —
18763101 TURNING DEVICE BUCKLE JR, JAMES J —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2621 1
3633 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18888743 COMPUTERIZED METHOD FOR MEASURING A PRODUCTION PALLET FOR PRECAST CONCRETE COMPONENT PARTS AND/OR A COMPONENT ARRANGED ON THE PRODUCTION PALLET SHERMAN, STEPHEN G 2621 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 18, 2024
18763101 TURNING DEVICE BUCKLE JR, JAMES J 3633 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 03, 2024

Managing Ebawe Anlagentechnik GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Ebawe Anlagentechnik GmbH have?

Ebawe Anlagentechnik GmbH has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Ebawe Anlagentechnik GmbH applications?

Stephen G Sherman has the most, with 1 of Ebawe Anlagentechnik GmbH's pending office actions.

What technology area are Ebawe Anlagentechnik GmbH's patent applications in?

Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month