1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire De Toulouse has 1 pending office action. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, MARTIN, KEVIN STEPHEN, who is the busiest examiner with 1 pending case. The data shows 0 distinct art units for this portfolio, indicating a highly specific or unique administrative path for this single pending matter. This concentration allows for a direct and singular focus on the specific requirements of the assigned examiner.
The presence of only 1 pending office action means that the institution's immediate prosecution risk is limited to a single case. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner involved, the applicant can dedicate resources to understanding the specific prior art preferences of MARTIN, KEVIN STEPHEN. This singular focus simplifies the administrative burden compared to larger portfolios. Practitioners can tailor their arguments specifically to the standards of the 1 distinct examiner identified in the data.
With 1 pending office action, the institution does not currently face the challenge of coordinating responses across multiple examiners or technical groups. The busiest examiner, MARTIN, KEVIN STEPHEN, holds the entirety of the institution's pending workload. This 1 pending office action serves as the primary indicator of the institution's current engagement with the USPTO. The lack of additional pending actions suggests a highly targeted approach to its filings at this time.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MARTIN, KEVIN STEPHEN | 1 | 77.4% | +23.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18860855 | USE OF SHP2 INHIBITORS FOR INHIBITING SENESCENCE | MARTIN, KEVIN STEPHEN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18860855 | USE OF SHP2 INHIBITORS FOR INHIBITING SENESCENCE | MARTIN, KEVIN STEPHEN | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18860855 | USE OF SHP2 INHIBITORS FOR INHIBITING SENESCENCE | MARTIN, KEVIN STEPHEN | — | §102§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 28, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialEcole Nationale Vétérinaire De Toulouse has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 0 art units and 1 examiners.
Kevin Stephen Martin has the most, with 1 of Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire De Toulouse's pending office actions.
