Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026

ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FÉDÉRALE DE LAUSANNE

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FÉDÉRALE DE LAUSANNE has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, LEVICKY, WILLIAM J, who is the busiest examiner with 1 pending case. The prosecution is occurring within 1 distinct art unit, providing a single focus for the institution's current patent activity. This concentration allows for a direct and singular focus on the specific requirements of the assigned examiner.

The presence of only 1 pending office action means that the institution's immediate prosecution risk is limited to a single case. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the applicant can dedicate resources to understanding the specific prior art preferences of LEVICKY, WILLIAM J. This singular focus within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area simplifies the administrative burden compared to larger portfolios. Practitioners can tailor their arguments specifically to the standards of the 1 distinct art unit identified in the data.

With 1 pending office action, the institution does not currently face the challenge of coordinating responses across multiple examiners or technical groups. The busiest examiner, LEVICKY, WILLIAM J, holds the entirety of the institution's pending workload. This 1 pending office action serves as the primary indicator of the institution's current engagement with the USPTO. The lack of additional pending actions suggests a highly targeted approach to its medical and mechanical filings at this time.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GEDEON, BRIAN T 1 87.0% +7.2%
LEVICKY, WILLIAM J 1 69.4% +29.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19130528 SYSTEM FOR CONTROL OF SPASTICITY GEDEON, BRIAN T —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18861167 NEUROMODULATION/NEUROSTIMULATION SYSTEM FOR MITIGATING LOCOMOTOR DEFICITS OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE, SPINAL CORD INJURY (SCI), STROKE AND/OR OTHER NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS LEVICKY, WILLIAM J —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18861167 NEUROMODULATION/NEUROSTIMULATION SYSTEM FOR MITIGATING LOCOMOTOR DEFICITS OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE, SPINAL CORD INJURY (SCI), STROKE AND/OR OTHER NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS LEVICKY, WILLIAM J —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3792 1
3796 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19130528 SYSTEM FOR CONTROL OF SPASTICITY GEDEON, BRIAN T 3792 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 15, 2025
18861167 NEUROMODULATION/NEUROSTIMULATION SYSTEM FOR MITIGATING LOCOMOTOR DEFICITS OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE, SPINAL CORD INJURY (SCI), STROKE AND/OR OTHER NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS LEVICKY, WILLIAM J 3796 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 28, 2024

Managing ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FÉDÉRALE DE LAUSANNE's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FÉDÉRALE DE LAUSANNE have?

ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FÉDÉRALE DE LAUSANNE has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FÉDÉRALE DE LAUSANNE applications?

Brian T Gedeon has the most, with 1 of ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FÉDÉRALE DE LAUSANNE's pending office actions.

What technology area are ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FÉDÉRALE DE LAUSANNE's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month