Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Edcast Inc.

Technology areas: Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Edcast Inc. operates a patent portfolio in the Communications technology area. The company currently has 3 pending office actions. This volume of active matters suggests a significant ongoing effort to secure patent rights, necessitating a strategy for responding to multiple examiner critiques across different technical sub-sectors.

The company's prosecution involves 3 distinct examiners across the distinct art units. This distribution indicates that the company's intellectual property is being evaluated across several different technical divisions. KATHLEEN M BROUGHTON is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This shows that the pending office actions are spread across the examination corps rather than being concentrated under one official.

The presence of the distinct examiners means that the company must navigate different individual examination styles. Because KATHLEEN M BROUGHTON only holds 1 busiest examiner pending action, no single examiner dominates the current workload. This variety in 3 distinct art units requires the applicant to maintain consistency in technical disclosures while addressing the specific requirements of multiple patent office divisions within the Communications sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (33%)
§101 + other1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
33% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BROUGHTON, KATHLEEN M 1 84.4% +10.3%
PRATT, EHRIN LARMONT 1 15.2% +12.9%
GRANT, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER 1 22.0% +7.1%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17364497 METHOD AND SYSTEM OF GUIDING A USER ON A GRAPHICAL INTERFACE WITH COMPUTER VISION BROUGHTON, KATHLEEN M 15d overdue
16412389 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SHOWING, TESTING AND CERTIFYING USERS IN-APP ON CLOUD APPLICATION WORKFLOWS PRATT, EHRIN LARMONT —
15992148 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ANIMATED WALKTHROUGHS IN AN ONLINE EDUCATIONAL PLATFORM GRANT, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17364497 METHOD AND SYSTEM OF GUIDING A USER ON A GRAPHICAL INTERFACE WITH COMPUTER VISION BROUGHTON, KATHLEEN M 15d overdue
16412389 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SHOWING, TESTING AND CERTIFYING USERS IN-APP ON CLOUD APPLICATION WORKFLOWS PRATT, EHRIN LARMONT —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2661 1
3629 1
3715 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
17364497 METHOD AND SYSTEM OF GUIDING A USER ON A GRAPHICAL INTERFACE WITH COMPUTER VISION BROUGHTON, KATHLEEN M 2661 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 15d overdue Pending Jun 30, 2021
16412389 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SHOWING, TESTING AND CERTIFYING USERS IN-APP ON CLOUD APPLICATION WORKFLOWS PRATT, EHRIN LARMONT 3629 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 14, 2019
15992148 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ANIMATED WALKTHROUGHS IN AN ONLINE EDUCATIONAL PLATFORM GRANT, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER 3715 §101 Final Rejection — Pending May 29, 2018

Managing Edcast Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Edcast Inc. have?

Edcast Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Edcast Inc. applications?

Kathleen M Broughton has the most, with 1 of Edcast Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Edcast Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month