Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Education4Sight GmbH currently manages 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single matter is assigned to a distinct examiner, WAESCO, JOSEPH M, who is also identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio with 1 pending action. The prosecution activity is concentrated in a sole distinct art unit.
This focused distribution suggests a specific technological scope for the current pending application. Practitioners should note that the examiner and art unit counts are identical, indicating no diversification across different USPTO divisions at this time.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WAESCO, JOSEPH M | 1 | 46.5% | +42.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19094715 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING KNOWLEDGE BASES OF ASSESSMENT ITEMS | WAESCO, JOSEPH M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19094715 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING KNOWLEDGE BASES OF ASSESSMENT ITEMS | WAESCO, JOSEPH M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3625 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19094715 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING KNOWLEDGE BASES OF ASSESSMENT ITEMS | WAESCO, JOSEPH M | 3625 | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 28, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial