Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Eelume AS is currently processing 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. The busiest examiner, LEE, BENJAMIN P, is handling 1 busiest examiner pending action. This single matter represents the entirety of the company's current pending interactions with the patent office.
The focus on 1 distinct art unit suggests a specific application of technology within the transportation or mechanical systems fields. Because there is only 1 pending office action, the prosecution strategy is highly concentrated on the feedback from LEE, BENJAMIN P. This 1 distinct examiner holds the 1 busiest examiner pending action, making their individual perspective critical to the portfolio. The limited scope allows for a very targeted approach to resolving the current matter within the assigned unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEE, BENJAMIN P | 1 | 80.0% | +17.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18245820 | UNDERWATER SNAKE ROBOT WITH EXTREME LENGTH | LEE, BENJAMIN P | 24d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18245820 | UNDERWATER SNAKE ROBOT WITH EXTREME LENGTH | LEE, BENJAMIN P | 24d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3641 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18245820 | UNDERWATER SNAKE ROBOT WITH EXTREME LENGTH | LEE, BENJAMIN P | 3641 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 24d overdue | Pending | Mar 17, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial