Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Eesavyasa Technologies Pvt Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This workload is handled by 1 distinct examiner and a single distinct art unit, indicating a singular focus for its current patenting efforts. Such a concentrated profile suggests that the company is prioritizing a specific invention or a very narrow field of chemical research.
PIRO, NICHOLAS ANTHONY is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, overseeing the pending office action. Prosecution strategy for the company is presently consolidated, as this examiner manages the total volume of pending actions. Success in this matter will require a deep understanding of this examiner's specific tendencies, as their decisions will dictate the outcome for the entire active portfolio. Practitioners should review the examiner's history with similar chemical technologies to optimize their response strategy.
The involvement of a single distinct art unit means that the company's technology is being evaluated within a very specific regulatory and technical framework. This lack of breadth across different art units simplifies the management of the portfolio but also increases the impact of any specific challenges encountered in this single unit. The company's current standing at the patent office is entirely defined by the progress of this single application. Efficient navigation of this office action is essential for maintaining the company's momentum in the Chemistry & Materials sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PIRO, NICHOLAS ANTHONY | 1 | 45.9% | +35.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18105823 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EXTRACTION OF IRON VALUES FROM RED MUD | PIRO, NICHOLAS ANTHONY | 88d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18105823 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EXTRACTION OF IRON VALUES FROM RED MUD | PIRO, NICHOLAS ANTHONY | 88d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1738 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18105823 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EXTRACTION OF IRON VALUES FROM RED MUD | PIRO, NICHOLAS ANTHONY | 1738 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 88d overdue | Pending | Feb 04, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial